Grupo az radio

Hi! I have recently worked with hire mvp development for startup, so I can share my experience. Overall, the impressions are mixed, but overall I would recommend them for creating an MVP if you have a limited budget and a limited time frame. First, I will talk about the pros. If you are launching a startup and need to make a working prototype, then they are a good team. They are focused on quickly testing hypotheses and minimizing functionality, which is very important for an MVP. We worked with them on a web application, and from the very beginning they offered a good approach: together with them, we determined which functions were really needed for the first release, and which could be postponed. This helped not to overload the product with unnecessary features and not to spend money on things that are not important at the start. It seems to be a standard story for any MVP, but often in such projects it happens that the customer or the mvp development services team delays the process, adding too much unnecessary. This was not the case here. However, there are a few points that are worth remembering. First, you need to be careful with deadlines. When we first started, they gave us specific deadlines, but in practice they are not always met. This is because the team often clarifies details and sometimes additional requirements arise that add time to the process. For example, we had delays when, after the first version, we started collecting feedback and it turned out that some functions needed to be improved. DigisCorp, of course, always warned about possible delays, but for a startup this can be critical if you have limited resources and deadlines.